WEKO3
アイテム
レギュラトリーサイエンス・ウォーズ−概念の混乱と科学論者の迷走−
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/57774
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/57774ef65ed35-8709-4e15-b36e-b58531ff0950
| Item type | 一般雑誌記事 / Article(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2010-09-09 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | レギュラトリーサイエンス・ウォーズ−概念の混乱と科学論者の迷走− | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | article | |||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | metadata only access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb | |||||
| 著者 |
齊尾, 武郎
× 齊尾, 武郎× 栗原, 千絵子× 栗原 千絵子 |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Background:The concept of "regulatory science" has a diverse range of meaning among its users and referred domains. Methods:Non-systematic review of the literature mentioning "regulatory science" written in either Japanese or English. Results:The origin of the term "regulatory science" in Japan is from a short column in an institutional newspaper written in 1987 which defined the term in an expanded sense and was easily modified by various people, whereas the one in North America is traceable to a few descriptions in the academic literature of the early 1970s and not much discussion was found on its concept. Some Japanese articles on "regulatory science" which include an article written by a leading scholar on science studies explained erroneously the origin of the term "regulatory science" in the Western context as an article written in 1972 which did not have any description of the term "regulatory science". The North American usage of the term "regulatory science" varies widely with both persons and times. Though there are several terms and concepts resembling "regulatory science" in North America, scant discussion has risen on their dissimilarities. One Japanese scholar on science studies wrote a detailed and frequently referred review article, but surprisingly, two of its key references did not mention the term "regulatory science" at all. Conclusions:Though much has been written about "regulatory science" in Japan, these descriptions on the origin of the term in the Western context are not accurate. The key Japanese article on "regulatory science" written by a scholar on science studies has fatal flaws in its discussion on the reference literature of importance which can be said to be due to scientific incompetence. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
臨床評価 巻 38, 号 1, p. 177-188, 発行日 2010-06 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0300-3051 | |||||
