ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 原著論文

The markerless lung target tracking AAPM Grand Challenge (MATCH) results

https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/85048
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/85048
05288f70-e7d5-4d23-8a4f-7ce27f72077d
Item type 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1)
公開日 2021-12-08
タイトル
タイトル The markerless lung target tracking AAPM Grand Challenge (MATCH) results
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ journal article
アクセス権
アクセス権 metadata only access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
著者 Mueller, Marco

× Mueller, Marco

WEKO 1025640

Mueller, Marco

Search repository
Poulsen, Per

× Poulsen, Per

WEKO 1025641

Poulsen, Per

Search repository
Hansen, Rune

× Hansen, Rune

WEKO 1025642

Hansen, Rune

Search repository
Verbakel, Wilko

× Verbakel, Wilko

WEKO 1025643

Verbakel, Wilko

Search repository
Ferguson , Dianne

× Ferguson , Dianne

WEKO 1025644

Ferguson , Dianne

Search repository
Roeske, John

× Roeske, John

WEKO 1025645

Roeske, John

Search repository
Ren , Lei

× Ren , Lei

WEKO 1025646

Ren , Lei

Search repository
Wang, Lei

× Wang, Lei

WEKO 1025647

Wang, Lei

Search repository
Zhang, Pengpeng

× Zhang, Pengpeng

WEKO 1025648

Zhang, Pengpeng

Search repository
Berbeco, Ross

× Berbeco, Ross

WEKO 1025649

Berbeco, Ross

Search repository
Shinichiro, Mori

× Shinichiro, Mori

WEKO 1025650

Shinichiro, Mori

Search repository
Keall, Paul

× Keall, Paul

WEKO 1025651

Keall, Paul

Search repository
Shinichiro, Mori

× Shinichiro, Mori

WEKO 1025652

en Shinichiro, Mori

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Introduction: Avoiding the risks and costs involved with the surgical insertion of radio-opaque fiducials, several commercial and academic markerless lung target tracking approaches have been developed to further improve patient safety during lung cancer stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR). However, these approaches had yet to be benchmarked using a common measurement methodology. This knowledge gap motivated the Markerless Lung Target Tracking Challenge (MATCH).
Method: The MATCH was an American Association of Physicists in Medicine sponsored Grand Challenge in 2019/2020. It was the first to include physical experiments with the goal to compare current Markerless Lung Target Tracking methods and it is still a live challenge to provide a tool and benchmark to compare future methods. During the main part of the MATCH, the participants aimed to localize lung targets accurately and precisely with time in a retrospective in-silico study and prospective phantom experiments. Common to both parts were an anthropomorphic thorax phantom including three lung targets [1], and a lung SABR planning protocol [2]. The phantom was moved rigidly with patient-measured lung target motion traces, which also acted as ground truth. In the retrospective in-silico study a volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment was simulated and a dataset consisting of treatment planning data and intra-treatment kV- and MV-images for four motion traces was provided to the participants. In the prospective phantom experiments the participants used their own markerless tracking approach and workflow to localize the target during the dose delivery for five motion traces. Participant submissions were analyzed and ranked based on the percentage of the tracking error values being within 2mm of the ground truth. The challenge was open to any participant, and participants could complete either one or both parts of the challenge.
Results: More than 20 institutions from four continents participated in the MATCH. The best percentage of the tracking error being within 2mm of the ground truth for the retrospective in-silico study was XX%, achieved by ZZ. Over all participants, the values ranged from AA% to BB%. The best percentage of the tracking error being within 2mm of the ground truth for the experimental phantom study was XX%, achieved by ZZ. Over all participants, the values ranged from AA% to BB%. All results for both parts delivered superior accuracy compared to no tracking.
Conclusion: A common methodology for measuring the accuracy of markerless lung target tracking algorithms has been developed and used to benchmark academic and commercial approaches retrospectively and prospectively. The MATCH is still a live challenge, with datasets and analysis software being available online at LINK.
書誌情報 Medical Physics

巻 49, 号 2, p. 1161-1180, 発行日 2022-02
出版者
出版者 Wiley
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0094-2405
DOI
識別子タイプ DOI
関連識別子 10.1002/mp.15418
関連サイト
識別子タイプ URI
関連識別子 https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.15418
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 17:04:33.648311
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3