ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 学会発表・講演等
  2. 口頭発表

Evaluation of Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for several ionization chamber types in carbon-ion beams

https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/84422
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/84422
838ef511-cd57-4627-bf6a-424770806b8b
Item type 会議発表用資料 / Presentation(1)
公開日 2021-12-27
タイトル
タイトル Evaluation of Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for several ionization chamber types in carbon-ion beams
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f
資源タイプ conference object
アクセス権
アクセス権 metadata only access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
著者 Urago, Yuka

× Urago, Yuka

WEKO 1019288

Urago, Yuka

Search repository
Sakama, Makoto

× Sakama, Makoto

WEKO 1019289

Sakama, Makoto

Search repository
Katayose, Tetsurou

× Katayose, Tetsurou

WEKO 1019290

Katayose, Tetsurou

Search repository
Chang, Weishan

× Chang, Weishan

WEKO 1019291

Chang, Weishan

Search repository
Yuka, Urago

× Yuka, Urago

WEKO 1019292

en Yuka, Urago

Search repository
Makoto, Sakama

× Makoto, Sakama

WEKO 1019293

en Makoto, Sakama

Search repository
Chang, Weishan

× Chang, Weishan

WEKO 1019294

en Chang, Weishan

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Background:
In IAEA TRS-398, the uncertainty of the absorbed dose to water Dw for carbon-ion beams is estimated to be over 3 %, which is larger than photons and protons. The standard uncertainty of the beam quality correction factor ????Q, a component of Dw, for carbon-ion beams is estimated to be 2.8 % for the cylindrical chambers and 3.2 % for the plane-parallel chambers. Therefore, ????Q is the dominant factor in the uncertainty of Dw. Calorimetry has been performed recently to reduce this uncertainty of ????Q in carbon-ion beams. However, the calorimetry condition is limited and the calorimetry results will need to be verified for consistency in the dosimetry chain data. Systematically estimated ????Q using MC simulation can make up for the shortcoming while it has hardly ever been reported. In this study, ????Q of 6 type ionization chambers for carbon-ion beams were evaluated using experimental measurements and MC simulations.
Methods:
The ????Q for each chamber was evaluated by 2 processes: measurements in QST-HIMAC in Japan and simulations with Geant4 ver. 10.2.p03. For the measurements, Dw in 60Co gamma-ray and 290 MeV/u-12C beams were measured using the subjected chambers and the reference chamber (PTW 30011) for obtaining ????Q ratio for each chamber of interest. For the simulations, absorbed dose to air in the sensitive volume of each chamber and the absorbed dose to water were calculated to acquire fQ, which is the product of the water-to-air stopping power ratio and the chamber-specific perturbation correction factor. The ????Q was calculated with fQ (simulations) and Wair (literature value).
Results:
The calculated ????Q ratios between the subjected chamber and the reference chamber showed good agreement with the measured ????Q ratios. The differences between the currently recommended ????Q in TRS-398 and calculated ????Q were 0.4 % for the cylindrical chambers and 0.9 % for the plane-parallel chambers at the maximum, respectively. The uncertainty of calculated ????Q was decreased by more than 1 % compared with 3 % at TRS-398.
Conclusion:
It was shown that it is possible to calculate ????Q for carbon-ion beams with high accuracy by MC simulations using Geant4.
会議概要(会議名, 開催地, 会期, 主催者等)
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 The 9th Korea-Japan Joint Meeting on Medical Physics
発表年月日
日付 2021-09-10
日付タイプ Issued
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 17:11:15.802766
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3