WEKO3
アイテム
Particle therapy using protons or carbon ions for cancer patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED): a retrospective multi‑institutional study
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/84407
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/844079de87f70-e6fb-499f-9b10-1e04427cfab3
Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2021-11-16 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Particle therapy using protons or carbon ions for cancer patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED): a retrospective multi‑institutional study | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | metadata only access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb | |||||
著者 |
Takayuki, Hashimoto
× Takayuki, Hashimoto× Yusuke, Demizu× Haruko, Numajiri× Tomonori, Isobe× Shigekazu, Fukuda× Masaru, Wakatsuki× Ryosuke, Kohno× al., et.× Shigekazu, Fukuda× Masaru, Wakatsuki× Ryosuke, Kohno |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | Purpose To evaluate the outcomes of particle therapy in cancer patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Materials and methods From April 2001 to March 2013, 19,585 patients were treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) or carbon ion therapy (CIT) at 8 institutions. Of these, 69 patients (0.4%, PBT 46, CIT 22, and PBT + CIT 1) with CIEDs (64 pacemakers, 4 implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and 1 with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator) were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients with CIEDs in this study were treated with the passive scattering type of particle beam therapy. Results Six (13%) of the 47 PBT patients, and none of the 23 CIT patients experienced CIED malfunctions (p = 0.105). Electrical resets (7) and over-sensing (3) occurred transiently in 6 patients. The distance between the edge of the irradiation field and the CIED was not associated with the incidence of malfunctions in 20 patients with lung cancer. A larger field size had a higher event rate but the test to evaluate trends as not statistically significant (p = 0.196). Conclusion Differences in the frequency of occurrence of device malfunctions for patients treated with PBT and patients treated with CIT did not reach statistical significance. The present study can be regarded as a benchmark study about the incidence of malfunctioning of CIED in passive scattering particle beam therapy and can be used as a reference for active scanning particle beam therapy. |
|||||
書誌情報 |
Japanese Journal of Radiology 巻 40, 号 5, p. 525-533, 発行日 2021-11 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 1867-1071 | |||||
DOI | ||||||
識別子タイプ | DOI | |||||
関連識別子 | 10.1007/s11604-021-01218-1 | |||||
関連サイト | ||||||
識別子タイプ | URI | |||||
関連識別子 | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11604-021-01218-1 |