ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 原著論文

Reviews on common objectives and evaluation indicators for risk communication activities from 2011 to 2017

https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/80372
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/80372
06bb871d-b557-4b0a-82bf-55ea1d782e75
Item type 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1)
公開日 2020-08-25
タイトル
タイトル Reviews on common objectives and evaluation indicators for risk communication activities from 2011 to 2017
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ journal article
アクセス権
アクセス権 metadata only access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
著者 Sato, Akiko

× Sato, Akiko

WEKO 898533

Sato, Akiko

Search repository
Honda, Kaori

× Honda, Kaori

WEKO 898534

Honda, Kaori

Search repository
Ono , Kyoko

× Ono , Kyoko

WEKO 898535

Ono , Kyoko

Search repository
Kanda , Reiko

× Kanda , Reiko

WEKO 898536

Kanda , Reiko

Search repository
I. Hayashi , Takehiko

× I. Hayashi , Takehiko

WEKO 898537

I. Hayashi , Takehiko

Search repository
Takeda , Yoshihito

× Takeda , Yoshihito

WEKO 898538

Takeda , Yoshihito

Search repository
Takebayashi , Yoshitake

× Takebayashi , Yoshitake

WEKO 898539

Takebayashi , Yoshitake

Search repository
Kobayashi , Tomoyuki

× Kobayashi , Tomoyuki

WEKO 898540

Kobayashi , Tomoyuki

Search repository
Murakami, Michio

× Murakami, Michio

WEKO 898541

Murakami, Michio

Search repository
Kanda, Reiko

× Kanda, Reiko

WEKO 898542

en Kanda, Reiko

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Background

Risk communication is widely accepted as a significant factor for policy makers, academic researchers, and practitioners in diverse fields. However, there remains a lack of comprehensive knowledge about how risk communication is currently conducted across fields and about the way risk communication is evaluated.


Methodology

This study systematically searched for materials from three scholarly search engines and one journal with a single search term of “risk communication.” The eligibility assessment selected peer-reviewed articles published in English that evaluated risk communication activities. Emphasis was placed on articles published in recent years accounting for about half of the pre-selected ones. Data on field of study, intervention timing, target audience, communication type, and objectives/evaluation indicators was extracted from the articles. Patterns of objectives/evaluation indicators used in risk communication activities were compared with those of the definitions and purposes of risk communication stated by relevant organizations. Association analysis was conducted based on study fields and objectives/evaluation indicators.


Results

The screening process yielded 292 articles that were published between 2011 and 2017 in various fields, such as medicine, food safety, chemical substances, and disasters/emergencies. The review process showed that many activities were performed in the medical field, during non-/pre-crisis periods. Recent activities primarily targeted citizens/Non-Profit Organizations (NPOs), and was disseminated in the form of large group or mass communication. While “knowledge increase,” “change in risk perception and concern alleviation,” and “decision making and behavior change” were commonly addressed in practice, “trust-building” and “reduction in psychological distress” were rarely focused. The analysis also indicated that the medical field tends to perform risk communication at the individual or small group level, in contrast to the food safety field. Further, risk communications in the non-/pre-crisis period are more likely to aim at “changes in risk perception and concern alleviation” than those in the crisis period. Risk communications that aim at “changes in risk perception and concern alleviation” are likely to be presented in a large group or mass communication, whereas those that aim at “decision making and behavior change” are likely to be conducted at the individual or small group level.


Conclusion

An overview of recent activities may provide those who engage in risk communication with an opportunity to learn from practices in different fields or those conducted in different intervention timings. Devoting greater attention to trust building and reduction in psychological distress and exploring non-citizen/NPO stakeholders’ needs would be beneficial across academic and professional disciplines.
書誌情報 Peer J

巻 8, p. e9730, 発行日 2020-08
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 2167-8359
DOI
識別子タイプ DOI
関連識別子 10.7717/peerj.9730
関連サイト
識別子タイプ URI
関連識別子 https://peerj.com/articles/9730/
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 17:58:23.437085
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3