ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 原著論文

臨床研究法の現状における課題と運用改善に向けた提言:GCP・医学系指針及び海外制度との比較から-第1報 医薬品等の品質・安全性の確保-

https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/79835
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/79835
90d386fd-2819-46e2-891c-12341c768d38
Item type 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1)
公開日 2020-04-09
タイトル
タイトル 臨床研究法の現状における課題と運用改善に向けた提言:GCP・医学系指針及び海外制度との比較から-第1報 医薬品等の品質・安全性の確保-
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ journal article
アクセス権
アクセス権 metadata only access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
著者 栗原, 千絵子

× 栗原, 千絵子

WEKO 868978

栗原, 千絵子

Search repository
Kurihara, Chieko

× Kurihara, Chieko

WEKO 868979

en Kurihara, Chieko

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Background:The Clinical Trials Act came into force in April 2018, and it requires conduct of clinical trials of medicinal product at a higher level of control than clinical trials regulated by the Governmental Ethical Guidelines. However, this level does not reach the level of Good Clinical Practice (GCP), an international standard for clinical trials applied in Japan to the trials aiming at new drug applications. In addition, discussions and information sharing among stakeholders engaged in the operation of the Act are insufficient
from the perspective of protecting research subjects and assuring the quality of the trials.
Objectives:This study aims to clarify the challenges in implementation of the Act and make proposals for improvement.
Method:This study uses a comparative analysis of the three regulations for clinical trials in Japan and a discussion based on the authors’ practical experience. This first report focuses on the quality and safety
assurance of medicinal products.
Results, Discussions, and Conclusions:We should conduct clinical trial under the Act, recognizing that the regulations under the Act define a policy of “Protection of subjects and quality assurance of the study,” which is compatible with the GCP standard. Additionally, we need to improve the operation of the Act in terms of investigational brochures, non-clinical studies, manufacturing standards, and adverse event reporting to move closer to the level to GCP for the purposes of quality and safety assurance for investigational medicinal products. This should be done at the level of the management system for the
research team and research institution. We will provide our additional analysis of quality control and assurance of the study and for research subject protection in the second and the third reports.
書誌情報 臨床評価

巻 47, 号 1, p. 127-152, 発行日 2020-04
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0300-3051
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 18:07:27.795135
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3