WEKO3
アイテム
On benchmarking of simulations of particle transport in ITER
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/77569
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/77569d554d125-e3b6-401e-8ed1-a357b033a087
Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2019-11-21 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | On benchmarking of simulations of particle transport in ITER | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | metadata only access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb | |||||
著者 |
Yong-Su, Na
× Yong-Su, Na× Koechl, F.× Polevoi, A.R.× Byun, C.S.× Na, D.H.× Seo, J.× Felici, F.× Fukuyama, A.× Garcia, J.× Hayashi, Nobuhiko× people, Others,many× Nobuhiko, Hayashi |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | We report results of benchmarking of core particle transport simulations by a collection of codes widely used in transport modelling of tokamak plasmas. Our analysis includes formulation of transport equations, difference between electron and ion solvers, comparison of modules of the pellet and edge gas fuelling on the ITER baseline scenario. During the first phase of benchmarking we address the particle transport effects in the stationary phase. Firstly, simulations are performed with identical sources, sinks, transport coefficients, and boundary conditions prescribed in the flattop H-mode phase. The transformation of ion particle transport equations is introduced so to directly compare their results to electron transport solvers. Secondly, the pellet fuelling models are benchmarked in various conditions to evaluate the dependency of the pellet deposition on the pellet volume, injection side, pedestal, and separatrix parameters. Thirdly, edge gas fuelling is benchmarked to assess sensitivities of source profile predictions to uncertainties in plasma conditions and detailed model assumptions. At the second phase, we address particle transport effects in the timeevolving plasma including the current ramp-up to the ramp-down phase. The ion and the electron solvers are benchmarked together. Differences between the simulation results of the solvers are investigated in terms of equilibrium, grid resolution, radial coordinate, radial grid distribution, and plasma volume evolution term. We found that the selection of the radial coordinate can yield prominent differences between the solvers mainly due to differences in the edge grid distribution. The simulations reveal that electron and ion solvers predict noticeably different density peaking for the same diffusion and pinch velocity while with the peaked profile of helium, expected in fusion reactors. The fuelling benchmarking shows that gas puffing is not efficient for core fuelling in H-modes and density control should be done by the high field side pellet injection in contrast to present machines. | |||||
書誌情報 |
Nuclear Fusion 巻 59, 号 7, p. 076026, 発行日 2019-06 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | IOP publishing | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 0029-5515 | |||||
DOI | ||||||
識別子タイプ | DOI | |||||
関連識別子 | 10.1088/1741-4326/ab15e0 | |||||
関連サイト | ||||||
識別子タイプ | URI | |||||
関連識別子 | https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-4326/ab15e0 |