WEKO3
アイテム
Diffusion-weighted imaging with multiple diffusion time to assess water-exchange between restricted and hindered diffusion components in vivo
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/72278
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/722781f2d026f-8067-4080-b8e5-807c5025acef
| Item type | 会議発表用資料 / Presentation(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-04-19 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Diffusion-weighted imaging with multiple diffusion time to assess water-exchange between restricted and hindered diffusion components in vivo | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f | |||||
| 資源タイプ | conference object | |||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | metadata only access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb | |||||
| 著者 |
Tachibana, Yasuhiko
× Tachibana, Yasuhiko× Obata, Takayuki× Omatsu, Tokuhiko× Kishimoto, Riwa× Feiweier, Thorsten× Tsuji, Hiroshi× 立花 泰彦× 小畠 隆行× 尾松 徳彦× 岸本 理和× 辻 比呂志 |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Synopsis We performed multi-b and multi-diffusion-time DWI (MbMdt-DWI) on human brain to visualize the mixture of restricted and hindered diffusion components, and also the water exchange between them. The diffusion parameters including the exchange time were calculated. The observed signal patterns clearly indicated the existence of the inter-compartmental water exchange. The calculated exchange time was within the appropriate range assumed from a previous cell-based study in vitro. MbMdt-DWI may be useful for assessing micro-diffusion in human brain. \n Purpose To assess the capability of multiple b-value with multiple diffusion-time (DT) diffusion-weighted imaging (MbMdt-DWI) to visualize the mixture of restricted and hindered diffusion-components and the water exchange between them in healthy human brain. \nMaterials and Methods Seven healthy female volunteers were recruited for this study (20-33 years, mean 24). Their brain MbMdT-DWIs were acquired by 3T MRI (MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a proto type sequence (Table 1). 11 b-values from 0 to 4000 sec/mm2 were selected, with two encoding directions, respectively. The separation times of the gradients (Δ) were set at 43.4, 63.4, and 83.4 msec, while the diffusion gradient duration (δ) was fixed at 25.0 msec. Regions-of-interest (ROI) were designated manually at the corticospinal tract of the left internal capsule (PLIC) and deep white matter of the left centrum semiovale (CS). A free-water phantom and a phantom of pure restricted-diffusion (Capillary Plate (CP), Hamamatsu Photonics, Japan) were scanned as well as references. 1.DT dependency was assessed by plotting the intra-ROI signal intensity (the mean of the two encoding directions) of the subjects. 2.A diffusion model based on the Karger model was assessed (Fig.1) [1-3]. The model consisted of restricted and hindered diffusion components (RDC and HDC: their fractions were fr and fh) with inter-compartment exchange. The measured signal at a certain DT was expressed as the sum of the signal from RDC (Cr(DT)) and HDC (Ch(DT)) (Fig.2 Eq.1). RDC was defined as the compartment of which the diffusion-coefficient (Dr) was inversely proportional to DT. A supplementary independent variable (A) was set to define this diffusion (A = Dr×DT) [3]. HDC was defined as the compartment with diffusion independent of DT. The diffusion-coefficient of HDC (Dh) was fixed at 0.0012 mm2/sec in this study. The inter-compartment exchange was defined by the exchange time from RDC to HDC (tr) and that from HDC to RDC (th) (Fig.2 Eq.2). The independent variables A, fr, and tr were calculated (Fig.2 Eq.3,4). The variables between PLIC and CS were statistically compared (Wilcoxon signed-rank test; P<0.05 was considered significant). \nResults 1.Strong DT dependency nearly linear with the b-value was found in CP, while no DT dependency was found in free water (Fig.3, upper row). In PLIC and CS, DT dependency was found at high b-values. Signal-intensity was elevated or it was slightly decreased when DT was increased from Δ=43.4 to 63.4 msec, and was then decreased by increasing DT further from Δ=63.4 to 83.4 msec (Fig.3, lower row). 2.The observed signal intensities were fit well by the signal-change-curve obtained from the calculated parameters of the proposed model (Fig. 2). The medians of fr and tr in PLIC were larger than those in CS, with significant differences. Statistical difference was not found in A (Table 2). \nDiscussion 1.The model of mixed RDC and HDC was reasonable in the DTs applied in this study, because a DT relation was found in high b-values, but not in low b-values in vivo. Furthermore, the fact that the signal was first elevated (or slightly decreased) and then decreased as DT increased may prove the existence of inter-compartment water exchange, because if the compartments were independent, the difference between different DTs should have increased monotonically (as adding the signal of CP and free water). 2.The significantly larger fr in PLIC than CS may suggest larger intra-axonal space, and the small difference in A may suggest a relatively consistent axon diameter by the analogy of the assessment of corticospinal tract by q-space imaging [4]. The significant difference found in tr (larger in PLIC) may possibly reflect myelin density. However, the results do not provide sufficient evidence to prove these hypotheses at this moment. Further study with larger numbers of MPG encoding directions, as well as longer diffusion time (requiring larger gradient strength to maintain TE) may support our results. On the other hand, another previous in vitro study that assessed water exchange in aquaporin-4-expressing and -non-expressing cells reported the exchange times from intra- to extra-cellular space as 43.1 msec and 100.7 msec, respectively [5]. The range included tr of PLIC and CS in this study, which may somewhat support the appropriateness of our results, as RDC may mostly belong to intracellular water. |
|||||
| 会議概要（会議名, 開催地, 会期, 主催者等） | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | ISMRM 2016 2016 Annual Meeting | |||||
| 発表年月日 | ||||||
| 日付 | 2016-06-11 | |||||
| 日付タイプ | Issued | |||||
