ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 学会発表・講演等
  2. ポスター発表

Continuation of Validation of Biological Dosimetry Analysis through International Networks

https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/70302
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/70302
fdec5a93-d718-49e3-9438-a453a0e6a407
Item type 会議発表用資料 / Presentation(1)
公開日 2010-10-27
タイトル
タイトル Continuation of Validation of Biological Dosimetry Analysis through International Networks
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f
資源タイプ conference object
アクセス権
アクセス権 metadata only access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
著者 Suto, Yumiko

× Suto, Yumiko

WEKO 690302

Suto, Yumiko

Search repository
et.al

× et.al

WEKO 690303

et.al

Search repository
數藤 由美子

× 數藤 由美子

WEKO 690304

en 數藤 由美子

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Biological dosimetry is an essential tool for estimating radiation dose received by an individual when physical dosimetry is lacking or in dispute, or as a complement when it is available. Currently, the dicentric chromosome assay (DCA) is the tool of choice for biological dosimetry, however, the assay is labor-intensive and time-consuming, therefore, strategies have been developed to increase its throughput for potential applications with radiation mass casualties. One such strategy is to develop biological dosimetry networks, both national and international to increase throughput when limited capacities of a single nation may be overwhelmed or insufficient for dose estimation for a large number of individuals. In a previous study, we evaluated the validity and accuracy of the DCA among five geographically dispersed cytogenetic biological dosimetry laboratories, in which dose estimates were provided after 1000 metaphases were analyzed. In a follow-up study, we tested the DCA in an abbreviated form using triage quality dose estimations from network laboratory partners, where doses were estimated by analyzing 20, 30, and 50 cells (or 30 dicentrics) per sample. The results from both these studies indicated that the dose estimates made were in good agreement with the applied doses and were adequate to provide valuable information for treatment. However, these dose estimates were made from calibration curves generated in each laboratory using blood samples that had all been irradiated with the same exposure system as the blinded samples. In an emergency situation, dose estimates will be made using calibration curves already existing in each laboratory and therefore, laboratories within one network will have calibration curves produced from different radiation sources. To validate this situation, dose estimates from the above described study will be re-analysed with dose estimates made based on pre-existing gamma radiation calibration curves in each laboratory. These estimates will be made using full 1000 metaphase spread scoring as well as triage quality scoring and compared to actual doses applied to the samples.
会議概要(会議名, 開催地, 会期, 主催者等)
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 EPRBioDose 2010
発表年月日
日付 2010-10-14
日付タイプ Issued
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 20:04:31.386478
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3