WEKO3
アイテム
Rapid phase-correlated rescanning irradiation improves treatment time in carbon-ion scanning beam treatment under irregular breathing
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/48089
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/480890023d731-b3ae-4f27-8484-41352e68f8f1
Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2017-07-13 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Rapid phase-correlated rescanning irradiation improves treatment time in carbon-ion scanning beam treatment under irregular breathing | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | metadata only access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb | |||||
著者 |
森, 慎一郎
× 森, 慎一郎× 古川, 卓司× 森 慎一郎× 古川 卓司 |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | To shorten treatment time in pencil beam scanning irradiation, we developed rapid phase-controlled rescanning (rPCR), which irradiates two or more isoenergy layers in a single gating window. Here, we evaluated carbon-ion beam dose distribution with rapid and conventional PCR (cPCR). 4 dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) imaging was performed on 12 subjects with lung or liver tumors. To compensate for intrafractional range variation, the eld-speci c target volume (FTV) was calculated using 4DCT within the gating window (T20–T80). We applied an amplitude-based gating strategy, in which the beam is on when the tumor is within the gating window de ned by treatment planning. Dose distributions were calculated for layered phase-controlled rescanning under an irregular respiratory pattern, although a single 4DCT data set was used. The number of rescannings was eight times. The prescribed doses were 48 Gy(RBE)/1 fr (where RBE is relative biological effectiveness) delivered via four beam ports to the FTV for the lung cases and 45 Gy(RBE)/2 fr delivered via two beam ports to the FTV for the liver cases. In the liver cases, the accumulated dose distributions showed an increased magnitude of hot/cold spots with rPCR compared with cPCR. The results of the dose assessment metrics for the cPCR and rPCR were very similar. The D95, Dmax, and Dmin values (cPCR/rPCR) averaged over all the patients were 96.3 ± 0.9%/96.0 ± 1.2%, 107.3 ± 3.6%/107.1 ± 2.9%, and 88.8 ± 3.2%/88.1 ± 3.1%, respectively. The treatment times in cPCR and rPCR were 110.7 s and 53.5 s, respectively. rPCR preserved dose conformation under irregular respiratory motion and reduced the total treatment time compared with cPCR. |
|||||
書誌情報 |
Physics in medicine and biology 巻 61, 号 10, p. 3857-3866, 発行日 2016-04 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | IOPscience | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 0031-9155 | |||||
DOI | ||||||
識別子タイプ | DOI | |||||
関連識別子 | 10.1088/0031-9155/61/10/3857 |