ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 原著論文

Systematic evaluation of four-dimensional hybrid depth scanning for carbon-ion lung therapy

https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/46690
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/46690
f3aa3e06-093f-444a-bb37-5c39d10c9e69
Item type 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1)
公開日 2013-12-27
タイトル
タイトル Systematic evaluation of four-dimensional hybrid depth scanning for carbon-ion lung therapy
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ journal article
アクセス権
アクセス権 metadata only access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
著者 Mori, Shinichiro

× Mori, Shinichiro

WEKO 465529

Mori, Shinichiro

Search repository
Furukawa, Takuji

× Furukawa, Takuji

WEKO 465530

Furukawa, Takuji

Search repository
Inaniwa, Taku

× Inaniwa, Taku

WEKO 465531

Inaniwa, Taku

Search repository
Marius, Zenklusen Silvan

× Marius, Zenklusen Silvan

WEKO 465532

Marius, Zenklusen Silvan

Search repository
Nakao, Minoru

× Nakao, Minoru

WEKO 465533

Nakao, Minoru

Search repository
Shirai, Toshiyuki

× Shirai, Toshiyuki

WEKO 465534

Shirai, Toshiyuki

Search repository
Noda, Kouji

× Noda, Kouji

WEKO 465535

Noda, Kouji

Search repository
森 慎一郎

× 森 慎一郎

WEKO 465536

en 森 慎一郎

Search repository
古川 卓司

× 古川 卓司

WEKO 465537

en 古川 卓司

Search repository
稲庭 拓

× 稲庭 拓

WEKO 465538

en 稲庭 拓

Search repository
Zenklusen Silvan Marius

× Zenklusen Silvan Marius

WEKO 465539

en Zenklusen Silvan Marius

Search repository
中尾 稔

× 中尾 稔

WEKO 465540

en 中尾 稔

Search repository
白井 敏之

× 白井 敏之

WEKO 465541

en 白井 敏之

Search repository
野田 耕司

× 野田 耕司

WEKO 465542

en 野田 耕司

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 PURPOSE:
Irradiation of a moving target with a scanning beam requires a comprehensive understanding of organ motion as well as a robust dose error mitigation technique. The authors studied the effects of intrafractional respiratory motion for carbon-ion pencil beam scanning with phase-controlled rescanning on dose distributions for lung tumors. To address density variations, they used 4DCT data.
METHODS:
Dose distributions for various rescanning methods, such as simple layer rescanning (LR), volumetric rescanning, and phase-controlled rescanning (PCR), were calculated for a lung phantom and a lung patient studies. To ensure realism, they set the scanning parameters such as scanning velocity and energy variation time to be similar to those used at our institution. Evaluation metrics were determined with regard to clinical relevance, and consisted of (i) phase-controlled rescanning, (ii) sweep direction, (iii) target motion (direction and amplitude), (iv) respiratory cycle, and (v) prescribed dose. Spot weight maps were calculated by using a beam field-specific target volume, which takes account of range variations for respective respiratory phases. To emphasize the impact of intrafractional motion on the dose distribution, respiratory gating was not used. The accumulated dose was calculated by applying a B-spline-based deformable image registration, and the results for phase-controlled layered rescanning (PCRL) and phase-controlled volumetric rescanning (PCRV) were compared.
RESULTS:
For the phantom study, simple LR was unable to improve the dose distributions for an increased number of rescannings. The phase-controlled technique without rescanning (1×PCRL and 1×PCRV) degraded dose conformity significantly due to a reduced scan velocity. In contrast, 4×PCRL or more significantly and consistently improved dose distribution. PCRV showed interference effects, but in general also improved dose homogeneity with higher numbers of rescannings. Dose distributions with single PCRL∕PCRV with a sweep direction perpendicular to motion direction showed large hot∕cold spots; however, this effect vanished with higher numbers of rescannings for both methods. Similar observations were obtained for the other dose metrics, such as target motion (SI∕AP), amplitude (6-22 mm peak-to-peak) and respiratory period (3.0-5.0 s). For four or more rescannings, both methods showed significantly better results, albeit that volumetric PCR was more affected by interference effects, which lead to severe degradation of a few dose distributions. The clinical example showed the same tendencies as the phantom study. Dose assessment metrics (D95, Dmax∕Dmin, homogeneity index) were improved with an increasing number of PCRL∕PCRV, but with PCRL being more robust.
CONCLUSIONS:
PCRL requires a longer treatment time than PCRV for high numbers of rescannings in the NIRS scanning system but is more robust. Although four or more rescans provided good dose homogeneity and conformity, the authors prefer to use more rescannings for clinical cases to further minimize dose degradation effects due to organ motion.
書誌情報 Medical Physics

巻 40, 号 3, p. 031720-1-031720-18, 発行日 2013-03
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0094-2405
関連サイト
識別子タイプ URI
関連識別子 http://online.medphys.org/resource/1/mphya6/v40/i3/p031720_s1
関連名称 http://online.medphys.org/resource/1/mphya6/v40/i3/p031720_s1
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 23:48:47.737112
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3