ログイン
Language:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 原著論文

Deep neural network-based synthetic image digital fluoroscopy using digitally reconstructed tomography.

https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/2000871
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/2000871
6726bcb4-6f96-499e-b230-4d17cde4015a
アイテムタイプ 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1)
公開日 2024-09-06
タイトル
タイトル Deep neural network-based synthetic image digital fluoroscopy using digitally reconstructed tomography.
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ journal article
著者 Shinichiro Mori

× Shinichiro Mori

Shinichiro Mori

Search repository
Ryusuke Hirai

× Ryusuke Hirai

Ryusuke Hirai

Search repository
Yukinobu Sakata

× Yukinobu Sakata

Yukinobu Sakata

Search repository
Yasuhiko Tachibana

× Yasuhiko Tachibana

Yasuhiko Tachibana

Search repository
Masashi Koto

× Masashi Koto

Masashi Koto

Search repository
Hitoshi Ishikawa

× Hitoshi Ishikawa

Hitoshi Ishikawa

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 We developed a deep neural network (DNN) to generate X-ray flat panel detector (FPD) images from digitally reconstructed radiographic (DRR) images. FPD and treatment planning CT images were acquired from patients with prostate and head and neck (H&N) malignancies. The DNN parameters were optimized for FPD image synthesis. The synthetic FPD images' features were evaluated to compare to the corresponding ground-truth FPD images using mean absolute error (MAE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). The image quality of the synthetic FPD image was also compared with that of the DRR image to understand the performance of our DNN. For the prostate cases, the MAE of the synthetic FPD image was improved (=?0.12?±?0.02) from that of the input DRR image (=?0.35?±?0.08). The synthetic FPD image showed higher PSNRs (=?16.81?±?1.54 dB) than those of the DRR image (=?8.74?±?1.56 dB), while SSIMs for both images (=?0.69) were almost the same. All metrics for the synthetic FPD images of the H&N cases were improved (MAE 0.08?±?0.03, PSNR 19.40?±?2.83 dB, and SSIM 0.80?±?0.04) compared to those for the DRR image (MAE 0.48?±?0.11, PSNR 5.74?±?1.63 dB, and SSIM 0.52?±?0.09). Our DNN successfully generated FPD images from DRR images. This technique would be useful to increase throughput when images from two different modalities are compared by visual inspection.
書誌情報 Physical and engineering sciences in medicine

巻 46, 号 3, p. 1227-1237, 発行日 2023-09
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 2662-4737
PubMed番号
識別子タイプ PMID
関連識別子 37349631
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-08-15 03:03:47.871762
Show All versions

Share

Share
tweet

Cite as

Other

print

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX
  • ZIP

コミュニティ

確認

確認

確認


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3