@article{oai:repo.qst.go.jp:00085276,
 author = {Fukata, Kyohei and Hidemasa, Kawamura and Nobuteru, Kubo and Tatsuaki, Kanai and Masami, Torikoshi and Nakano, Takashi and Mutsumi, Tashiro and Tatsuya, Ohno and Hidemasa, Kawamura and Nobuteru, Kubo and Tatsuaki, Kanai and Masami, Torikoshi and Takashi, Nakano and Mutsumi, Tashiro and Tatsuya, Ohno},
 journal = {Physica Medica},
 month = {Oct},
 note = {This retrospective study assessed the treatment planning data and clinical outcomes for 152 prostate cancer patients: 76 consecutive patients treated by carbon-ion radiation therapy and 76 consequtive patients treated by moderate hypo-fractionated intensity-modulated photon radiation therapy. These two modalities were compared using linear quadratic model equivalent doses in 2 Gy per fraction for rectal or rectal wall dose–volume histogram, 3.6 Gy per fraction-converted rectal dose–volume histogram, normal tissue complication probability model, and actual clinical outcomes. Carbon-ion radiation therapy was predicted to have a lower probability of rectal adverse events than intensity-modulated photon radiation therapy based on dose–volume histograms and normal tissue complication probability model. There was no difference in the clinical outcome of rectal adverse events between the two modalities compared in this study.},
 pages = {6--12},
 title = {Retrospective comparison of rectal toxicity between carbon-ion radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy based on treatment plan, normal tissue complication probability model, and clinical outcomes in prostate cancer},
 volume = {90},
 year = {2021}
}