@misc{oai:repo.qst.go.jp:00071581, author = {Ando, Yutaka and Kamada, Tadashi and Nakano, Takashi and Akimoto, Tetsuo and Murayama, Shigeyuki and Mizoe, Junetsu and Fuwa, Nobukazu and Shioyama, Yoshiyuki and Hishikawa, Yoshio and et.al and 安藤 裕 and 鎌田 正 and 中野 隆史 and 秋元 哲夫 and 村山 重行 and 溝江 純悦 and 不破 信和 and 塩山 善之 and 菱川 良夫}, month = {Jun}, note = {  Backgrounds: In Japan, we have experienced the particle therapy for more than 30 years. The Japan Clinical Study Group of Particle Therapy (JCPT) studied the achievements of the Japanese particle therapy from 2002 to 2014. The JCPT member consisted of the twelve particle therapy institutions; (1) Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, (2) Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, (3) Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center (4) Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, (5) Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, (6) Proton Therapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, (7) The Wakasa Wan Energy Research Center, (8) Fukui prefectural Hospital Proton Therapy Center, (9) Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, (10) Hyogo Ion Beam Medical center, (11) Ion Beam Therapy Center, SAGA HIMAT Foundation and (12) Medipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center. Our study group covered the all Japanese particle therapy institutions. The aim of this paper is to develop the clinical database concerning with Japanese particle therapy and to evaluate the feasibility of particle therapy case database. \nMethods: The JCPT office gathered each institution’s annual report and analyzed the number of treatments. Malignant primary tumors were classified into CNS, head and neck, lung, upper digestive organ, liver, pancreas, gynecological organ, prostate, bone and soft tissue, rectum and other or unclassified organs. Particle therapy was divided into a proton therapy and a carbon ion therapy. At 2012 we decided that we should develop the clinical particle therapy database for more precise analysis. We prepared the hardware and software of the clinical database. Participating institutions send records of cases after anonymization (Fig. 1). JCPT office handled each data in secure and safety environment. The office prepared a suitable conversion method from each hospital format to standard format. \nResults: The number of particle therapy treatment from 1979 to 2012 reached 21,506. Numbers of patients treated by proton and carbon ion are 12,150 and 9,356 showed in Fig.2. We defined the schema of database. This schema consists of (1) patient informations including primary lesion, stage, performance status, treatment purpose and (2) follow-up information including primary effect, recurrence and secondary effect. Many institutions cannot adapt to this schema of database. Some hospital database systems do not contain the suitable fields corresponding to the JCPT database fields. We found that the collecting method from a proprietary database to the common database needs more consideration. \nConclusions: We reported the activity of Japanese particle therapy for more than 30 years. Moreover we think that the analysis of the particle therapy is very important for the radiation oncology. We will be able to realize the desirable co-operation between the JCPT hospitals and establish the Japanese clinical database related to the proton and carbon ion therapy., PTCOG53rd(Annual Conference of the Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group)においてポスター発表を行う}, title = {Development of Particle Therapy Database by Japan Clinical Study Group of Particle Therapy}, year = {2014} }