ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 学会発表・講演等
  2. ポスター発表

QA Guideline for Particle Beam Therapy Equipment

https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/71046
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/71046
612de74a-d45b-4f23-a280-c18cd0df41f1
Item type 会議発表用資料 / Presentation(1)
公開日 2013-02-13
タイトル
タイトル QA Guideline for Particle Beam Therapy Equipment
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f
資源タイプ conference object
アクセス権
アクセス権 metadata only access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
著者 Fukumura, Akifumi

× Fukumura, Akifumi

WEKO 698306

Fukumura, Akifumi

Search repository
et.al

× et.al

WEKO 698307

et.al

Search repository
福村 明史

× 福村 明史

WEKO 698308

en 福村 明史

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Introduction: The first particle beam therapy equipment QA guideline [1] was published from Japan in 2005. However, the QA procedure, tolerance values, action levels, etc. which QMP (qualified medical physicist) should perform periodically are not included in the guideline. Therefore we are renewing the QA guideline for particle beam therapy equipment of broad beam technique such as passive scattering. Particle beam considered in this guideline is proton and carbon.
Method: Three proton and two carbon facilities which have different manufactured particle therapy equipment were picked up, and one or two QMP from each institution organized to summarize QA procedure based on the QA policy of each institution and reports published by AAPM or ICRU.
Result: AAPM TG-142 [2] provides three action levels and specifies the tolerances for each procedure associated with levels 2 and 3, except level 1. On the other hand, in this guideline provides two action levels and specifies tolerances for each action level. One is "inspection action level" which is out of acceptance test value; however that has no affects for treatment. The other is "immediate action level" which may affect treatment and need to take an immediate decision, i.e. limited treatment or stop treatment.
Conclusion: Since particle therapy machine has a wide variety compared to conventional electron linacs, it was difficult to construct the QA procedure for all particle equipment. Future issues we have to consider as a next guideline is QA about the particle beam planning systems and the active scanning method.
References:
[1]Japanese Society of Medical Physics, Task G; Particle Therapy Research Center of Heavy Ion Radiotherapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences: Guidelines of Physical and Technological Quality Assurance for Particle Beam Therapy, 2005
[2]AAPM Task Group 142: Quality assurance of medical accelerators, Med. Phys. 36, 4197-4212, 2009.
会議概要(会議名, 開催地, 会期, 主催者等)
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 Third International Conference on Real-time Tumor-tracking Radiation Therapy with 4D Molecular Imaging Technique
発表年月日
日付 2013-02-08
日付タイプ Issued
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 19:55:49.496119
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3