WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "68aa854b-b55b-45f2-84bd-150b2ecf811b"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 1, "id": "82882", "owners": [1], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "82882"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:repo.qst.go.jp:00082882", "sets": ["29"]}, "author_link": ["951359", "951363", "951354", "951360", "951358", "951362", "951353", "951364", "951356", "951357", "951361", "951355"], "item_10005_date_7": {"attribute_name": "発表年月日", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_date_issued_datetime": "2021-04-17", "subitem_date_issued_type": "Issued"}]}, "item_10005_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "[Purpose] Breast-dedicated PET systems are categorized into two types: a ring-shaped detector arrangement and a dual (top and bottom) flat-panel detector arrangement. Although the flat-panel system allows imaging axillary lymph nodes from the same view as X-ray mammography, PET images are blurred (i.e. spatial resolution is degraded) along the direction connecting the detectors (defined as Z direction) due to the limited angular coverage. To compensate for this issue, we proposed a third type, a dual round-edge detector arrangement. The “round-edge” is a geometry in which the detector blocks at both edge positions were tilted toward the center of the field-of-view (FOV). For proof of concept, we developed a small prototype and evaluated the spatial resolution.\n[Methods] The prototype was composed of 32 detector blocks (Top and bottom pairs of 2 rows × 8 columns). A 14×14 array of 1.45×1.45×15 mm3 GFAG scintillator was coupled with an 8×8 array of silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) with a photosensitive area of 3.0×3.0 mm2. A 22Na Derenzo-like multi-rod phantom (rod diameters: 1.6, 2.2, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 mm) was used for spatial resolution measurement. The phantom was measured in the two directions (XY plane and XZ plane) at the center of the FOV. The flat-panel arrangement was also examined for comparison. \n[Results] In the XY plane, the 1.6 mm rods were clearly resolved in both arrangements. In the XZ plane, the round-edge arrangement significantly improved the spatial resolution compared with the flat-panel arrangement. While the flat-panel arrangement could not resolve the 3.0 mm rods, the round-edge arrangement clearly resolved the 2.2 mm rods. \n[Conclusion] We have demonstrated the dual round-edge detector arrangement can provide a better spatial resolution than the conventional flat-panel arrangement.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10005_description_6": {"attribute_name": "会議概要(会議名, 開催地, 会期, 主催者等)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "第121回日本医学物理学会学術大会", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "metadata only access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Go, Akamatsu"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "951353", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Eiji, Yoshida"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "951354", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Hideaki, Tashima"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "951355", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Shigeki, Ito"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "951356", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Miwako, Takahashi"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "951357", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Taiga, Yamaya"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "951358", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Go, Akamatsu", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "951359", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Eiji, Yoshida", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "951360", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Hideaki, Tashima", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "951361", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Shigeki, Ito", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "951362", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Miwako, Takahashi", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "951363", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Taiga, Yamaya", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "951364", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "conference object", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f"}]}, "item_title": "Dual round-edge detector arrangement for breast PET: a proof of concept study", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Dual round-edge detector arrangement for breast PET: a proof of concept study"}]}, "item_type_id": "10005", "owner": "1", "path": ["29"], "permalink_uri": "https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/82882", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2021-05-27"}, "publish_date": "2021-05-27", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "82882", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Dual round-edge detector arrangement for breast PET: a proof of concept study"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
Dual round-edge detector arrangement for breast PET: a proof of concept study
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/82882
https://repo.qst.go.jp/records/82882d506614d-3d33-41ce-8b0d-9d7bad9fccfa
Item type | 会議発表用資料 / Presentation(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2021-05-27 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Dual round-edge detector arrangement for breast PET: a proof of concept study | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f | |||||
資源タイプ | conference object | |||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | metadata only access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb | |||||
著者 |
Go, Akamatsu
× Go, Akamatsu× Eiji, Yoshida× Hideaki, Tashima× Shigeki, Ito× Miwako, Takahashi× Taiga, Yamaya× Go, Akamatsu× Eiji, Yoshida× Hideaki, Tashima× Shigeki, Ito× Miwako, Takahashi× Taiga, Yamaya |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | [Purpose] Breast-dedicated PET systems are categorized into two types: a ring-shaped detector arrangement and a dual (top and bottom) flat-panel detector arrangement. Although the flat-panel system allows imaging axillary lymph nodes from the same view as X-ray mammography, PET images are blurred (i.e. spatial resolution is degraded) along the direction connecting the detectors (defined as Z direction) due to the limited angular coverage. To compensate for this issue, we proposed a third type, a dual round-edge detector arrangement. The “round-edge” is a geometry in which the detector blocks at both edge positions were tilted toward the center of the field-of-view (FOV). For proof of concept, we developed a small prototype and evaluated the spatial resolution. [Methods] The prototype was composed of 32 detector blocks (Top and bottom pairs of 2 rows × 8 columns). A 14×14 array of 1.45×1.45×15 mm3 GFAG scintillator was coupled with an 8×8 array of silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) with a photosensitive area of 3.0×3.0 mm2. A 22Na Derenzo-like multi-rod phantom (rod diameters: 1.6, 2.2, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 mm) was used for spatial resolution measurement. The phantom was measured in the two directions (XY plane and XZ plane) at the center of the FOV. The flat-panel arrangement was also examined for comparison. [Results] In the XY plane, the 1.6 mm rods were clearly resolved in both arrangements. In the XZ plane, the round-edge arrangement significantly improved the spatial resolution compared with the flat-panel arrangement. While the flat-panel arrangement could not resolve the 3.0 mm rods, the round-edge arrangement clearly resolved the 2.2 mm rods. [Conclusion] We have demonstrated the dual round-edge detector arrangement can provide a better spatial resolution than the conventional flat-panel arrangement. |
|||||
会議概要(会議名, 開催地, 会期, 主催者等) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 第121回日本医学物理学会学術大会 | |||||
発表年月日 | ||||||
日付 | 2021-04-17 | |||||
日付タイプ | Issued |